Sunday, March 27, 2011

BusterStronghart@Gmail.

Bob Herbert was a columnist for the New York Times, who could be relied upon to give the working man his due. This is what he wrote for his last column.
Losing Our Way
So here we are pouring shiploads of cash into yet another war, this time in Libya, while simultaneously demolishing school budgets, closing libraries, laying off teachers and police officers, and generally letting the bottom fall out of the quality of life here at home.
Welcome to America in the second decade of the 21st century. An army of long-term unemployed workers is spread across the land, the human fallout from the Great Recession and long years of misguided economic policies. Optimism is in short supply. The few jobs now being created too often pay a pittance, not nearly enough to pry open the doors to a middle-class standard of living.
 
Arthur Miller, echoing the poet Archibald MacLeish, liked to say that the essence of America was its promises. That was a long time ago. Limitless greed, unrestrained corporate power and a ferocious addiction to foreign oil have led us to an era of perpetual war and economic decline. Young people today are staring at a future in which they will be less well off than their elders, a reversal of fortune that should send a shudder through everyone.
 
The U.S. has not just misplaced its priorities. When the most powerful country ever to inhabit the earth finds it so easy to plunge into the horror of warfare but almost impossible to find adequate work for its people or to properly educate its young, it has lost its way entirely.
 
Nearly 14 million Americans are jobless and the outlook for many of them is grim. Since there is just one job available for every five individuals looking for work, four of the five are out of luck. Instead of a land of opportunity, the U.S. is increasingly becoming a place of limited expectations. A college professor in Washington told me this week that graduates from his program were finding jobs, but they were not making very much money, certainly not enough to think about raising a family.
 
There is plenty of economic activity in the U.S., and plenty of wealth. But like greedy children, the folks at the top are seizing virtually all the marbles. Income and wealth inequality in the U.S. have reached stages that would make the third world blush. As the Economic Policy Institute has reported, the richest 10 percent of Americans received an unconscionable 100 percent of the average income growth in the years 2000 to 2007, the most recent extended period of economic expansion.
 
Americans behave as if this is somehow normal or acceptable. It shouldn’t be, and didn’t used to be. Through much of the post-World War II era, income distribution was far more equitable, with the top 10 percent of families accounting for just a third of average income growth, and the bottom 90 percent receiving two-thirds. That seems like ancient history now.
 
The current maldistribution of wealth is also scandalous. In 2009, the richest 5 percent claimed 63.5 percent of the nation’s wealth. The overwhelming majority, the bottom 80 percent, collectively held just 12.8 percent.
 
This inequality, in which an enormous segment of the population struggles while the fortunate few ride the gravy train, is a world-class recipe for social unrest. Downward mobility is an ever-shortening fuse leading to profound consequences.
 
A stark example of the fundamental unfairness that is now so widespread was in The New York Times on Friday under the headline: “G.E.’s Strategies Let It Avoid Taxes Altogether.” Despite profits of $14.2 billion — $5.1 billion from its operations in the United States — General Electric did not have to pay any U.S. taxes last year.
 
As The Times’s David Kocieniewski reported, “Its extraordinary success is based on an aggressive strategy that mixes fierce lobbying for tax breaks and innovative accounting that enables it to concentrate its profits offshore.”
 
G.E. is the nation’s largest corporation. Its chief executive, Jeffrey Immelt, is the leader of President Obama’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness. You can understand how ordinary workers might look at this cozy corporate-government arrangement and conclude that it is not fully committed to the best interests of working people.
 
Overwhelming imbalances in wealth and income inevitably result in enormous imbalances of political power. So the corporations and the very wealthy continue to do well. The employment crisis never gets addressed. The wars never end. And nation-building never gets a foothold here at home.
 
New ideas and new leadership have seldom been more urgently needed.

Sunday, March 20, 2011

BusterStronghart@Gmail.com


predestinarianism
 
In the spring garden
the silky yellow crocus
is suddenly there


Basil Pessin,

Saturday, March 19, 2011

BusterStronghart@Gmail.com

Stronghart

Is truth beauty? asks 14 year old grandson


No doubt your grandson is reading Keats, and a good thing it is.

Truth
Beauty
Justice

Can we live for these three things. Have we? Certainly the four of you have made an effort in those honorable directions. You have nothing of which to be ashamed. Whereas some of us have much for which to make up. Repairs. Note, when you re-read the poem that it is not Keats who makes the point; rather it is written on the urn. We do not know whether Keats believed that truth is beauty and beauty is truth.

Ode on a Grecian Urn

THOU still unravish'd bride of quietness,
Thou foster-child of Silence and slow Time,
Sylvan historian, who canst thus express
A flowery tale more sweetly than our rhyme:
What leaf-fringed legend haunts about thy shape 5
Of deities or mortals, or of both,
In Tempe or the dales of Arcady?
What men or gods are these? What maidens loth?
What mad pursuit? What struggle to escape?
What pipes and timbrels? What wild ecstasy? 10

Heard melodies are sweet, but those unheard
Are sweeter; therefore, ye soft pipes, play on;
Not to the sensual ear, but, more endear'd,
Pipe to the spirit ditties of no tone:
Fair youth, beneath the trees, thou canst not leave 15
Thy song, nor ever can those trees be bare;
Bold Lover, never, never canst thou kiss,
Though winning near the goal—yet, do not grieve;
She cannot fade, though thou hast not thy bliss,
For ever wilt thou love, and she be fair! 20

Ah, happy, happy boughs! That cannot shed
Your leaves, nor ever bid the Spring adieu;
And, happy melodist, unwearièd,
For ever piping songs for ever new;
More happy love! more happy, happy love! 25
For ever warm and still to be enjoy'd,
For ever panting, and for ever young;
All breathing human passion far above,
That leaves a heart high-sorrowful and cloy'd,
A burning forehead, and a parching tongue. 30

Who are these coming to the sacrifice?
To what green altar, O mysterious priest,
Lead'st thou that heifer lowing at the skies,
And all her silken flanks with garlands drest?
What little town by river or sea-shore, 35
Or mountain-built with peaceful citadel,
Is emptied of its folk, this pious morn?
And, little town, thy streets for evermore
Will silent be; and not a soul, to tell
Why thou art desolate, can e'er return. 40

O Attic shape! fair attitude! with brede
Of marble men and maidens overwrought,
With forest branches and the trodden weed;
Thou, silent form! dost tease us out of thought
As doth eternity: Cold Pastoral!
45
When old age shall this generation waste,
Thou shalt remain, in midst of other woe
Than ours, a friend to man, to whom thou say'st,
'Beauty is truth, truth beauty,—that is all
Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know.'
______________________________________________________
It seems to me on re-reading the poem for the first time in fifty or so years that the beauty of the urn is absolutely not truthful, as Keats tells us, more than once, that the articles of beauty depicted on the urn are not transitory, in fact that each article of beauty transits generations--and remains frozen in time. Unlike the reality of Therefore Beauty is not truth.

Whereas, we know that all things evanesce, change, are destroyed, as Shelly reminds us in Ozymandius:
___________________________________________
Ozymandius
I met a traveler from an antique land,
Who said--"Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert . . . . Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them, the heart that fed;
And on the pedestal, these words appear:
My name is Ozymandius, King of Kings,
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away."

_________________________________________________________

Ralph warns us that it is our duty, in fact it is our only duty not to lie; that is to be truthful: but then what are we doing when we take ugliness and make art of it as in Strange Fruit, or Guernica? Are we truthful when we deny our essential loneliness; when we deny the predictability of chaos? But our loneliness is beautiful and so is chaos.

Thursday, March 10, 2011

BusterStronghart@Gmail.com

Whether man or woman, at the end of a love affair it is when you have the most to say that you cannot speak. 

.mek



BusterStronghart@Gmail.com

Most of a lifetime spent on this street.
Posted by Picasa
Ozymandias


I met a traveller from an antique land
Who said: `Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown,

And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed.


And on the pedestal these words appear --


"My name is Ozymandias, king of kings:
Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!"
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.'

Percy Bysshe Shelley







Posted by Picasa

Wednesday, March 02, 2011

BusterStronghart@Gmail.com

The past holds: Grudges, unresolved grievances, unforgiven offenses, guilt. (notice the alliteration please).

Plus, the Past effects the future: Bearing the burden of Guilt; Fear of the consequences of what we did and failed to do; Punishment, Regret and - Addiction: to ideation, beliefs, responses. Do we need any other reasons to find and remain forever after with the elusive NOW.
mg

Sunday, February 20, 2011

BusterStronghart@Gmail.com


G asks a Question: Have we been held together by the knowledge that, essentially, we share the same concerns? We know each other to the extent we know ourselves??? If so, does this offer the possibility that: Everybody else shares those same concerns? Is EVERYBODYessentially, the same?


Something happened to a draft I wrote a few hours ago. So, maybe you received it, or maybe we will benefit by the simmering of my unconscious thought process since I wrote that draft. If you’ve already read something like this,  then we know that there is some Truth in what I have to say--Truth, at least, for myself, if not for each of us. 

We've always been concerned with Truth, perhaps that concern began when first we discovered that some things were not True, and even more important, that it is possible to deceive others. I know that I have always been an admirer of G's attention to the True, and his many journeys to find it, some far away and some quite close. S. has a similar need, grown out of the political lies that he had discerned early in his life. Those lies became, for him, painful, and political Truth became a panacea. Understanding his strength and honest directness makes it easy to be with him.

But, of course, I am off course. The question on the table is:  what has held us together, and a part b, does that mean that everybody is the same as us...

Surely you jest, G, when you ask if everyone is the same as us. No, Virginia, we are part of a unique subset of the Human Race. So much for part b.

What are we? Products of Secular Jewish Upper-Middle-Class households, with aspirations to assimilate -- those aspirations stronger with some of our parents than others. Each household was of a liberal bent, and maintained the usual Jewish respect for knowledge, books, and education.  We were sent to a fine school that reinforced those values. There we met and eyed each other from afar, at first.

 Held us together?  Time, itself, binds tightly--but that's only one of the knots. There are others. There is the Truth of our Mutual Nakedness--we've each known each other in the Before, and so roles and masks, blessedly, don't work with us.  We know each other. Truth again.  And don’t you think that the Truth of Us is the tightest of all the knots?  

Generally we share a certain degree of intelligence--within a range--S. being a outlier, perhaps, but the rest of us are of roughly equal intelligence -- I could rank us--but I don't like to put a certain person on the bottom. So we are in a common range...I have always held that nearly equivalent intelligence drew married people together, as much as pheromones, or common interests like tennis or bridge. Likewise with friends.

Before now only S. reinvented himself and led a life different from that of all that preceded him. But when we came together at fifty, the essential was still there, we recognized him for what he was, just a boy like us.  And he knew us.

Of course, there is the element “G..”  G. is been the a magnet and has always kept us together. I fret that his relocation to the West will damage what we have. Perhaps allow it to slip apart.  We knew each others’ parents -- an important element; we know our histories, more than our second and third wives, I think. We knew each others' wives in series. More ties that bind.

Not one of us had natural brothers. Mine was much older and had been in South Pacific during the war. A, S, D, H, and M had none. G had two brothers but they were estranged . So more than comradeship there was a brotherhood of necessity, that later involved into this brother-ship, albeit a dwindling as time has stolen A, S, D, & H.  

Our familiarity with each other is without parallel. Notice that familiarity has the same root as family. We’ve always treated each other as equals. We’ve accepted each of us for what we are, have never asked for change, and have been loyal that no-holds-barred, stripped-of-all-pretension, naked man that we’ve known for over fifty years.

I am waiting to read the other replies – and G,  you aren’t excused from the exercise. Asking  the Q doesn’t exempt you from an A.

Saturday, February 19, 2011

BusterStronghart@Gmail.com

Last night I was happy to share a trencher of mutton-chops and a flagon of ale with a friend of many years who once worked at the buttery.  We celebrated our past marriages, and future funerals, and finally uncorked a superb Tokay, drawn from my cellar having been stocked in those old days when money flowed like water and everyone thought that they would be afloat forever.

Thursday, February 17, 2011

A lie flies around the world before the Truth has a chance to put  its pants on.  Winston Churchill

Would you rather find solutions or play the blame game? mek

Saturday, February 05, 2011

BusterStronghart@Gmail.com

In Staring at the Sun,  Yalom reminds us of Schopenhauer's dictum that it is only what a man is that counts, neither wealth, nor status, nor good reputation makes us happy.
 
Is Yalom saying that happiness is, in itself, the ultimate goal, the object of life?  The idea seems like what you aim for--a shedding of all learned value in order to strip down to a reality, an essential you. Something that you have been seeking for some time, long before you left for California.
 
We know that material possessions, though attracting, never satisfy. We know early on that things anchor us and never free us.
 
What others think of us is transient, I think. Though it was important to my father that he go to his grave with his name intact;  I myself can see that,  like possessions, reputation is mutable and  tarnishes and leaves us with a murky reflection, sometimes so indistinct that we, ourselves, can not see or know it.
 
Yalom says that we need a clear conscience, in order to know ourselves, And that in the end it is our interpretation of experience that brings happiness--not the experiences themselves.

Saturday, January 15, 2011

BusterStronghart@Gmail.com

Cohn had a wonderful quality of bringing out the worst in anybody."


- Chapter 10, The Sun Also Rises, Ernest Hemingway

Thursday, January 13, 2011

BusterStronghart@Gmail.com

man·sue·tude

[man-swi-tood, -tyood] 
–noun
mildness; gentleness: the mansuetude of Christian love
mansuetude \MAN-swi-tood\, noun:
Mildness; gentleness.
For indeed, it is possible to attain a state of divine mansuetude that nothing dismays and nothing surprises, just as one in love might, after many years, arrive at a sublime tranquillity of the sentiments, sure of their force and durability, through constant experience of their pleasures and pains.
-- Honoré de Balzac, Jordan Stump, Adam Gopnik, The Wrong Side of Paris
You are safe, dear old man, you are safe, temporarily, in the mansuetude of our care, Julie said.
-- Donald Barthelme, Donald Antrim, The dead father
Mansuetude derives from the Latin mansuescere, literally "to tame by the hand."


Origin:
1350–1400;  ME < L mānsuētūdō  tameness, mildness, equiv. to mānsuē-,  base of mānsuēscere  to become tame, mild ( man ( us ) hand + suēscere  to become accustomed) + -tūdō -tude

Saturday, December 25, 2010

BusterStronghart@Gmail.com

For true wisdom to emerge, there can be no distractions. Any preoccupations of the world, no matter how small or inconsequential they may seem, will be heard as shouts that drown out the still voice within. It is not enough to rid yourself of inner turmoil, though that is a step in the right direction. The next step is to eliminate outer turmoil, through isolation and withdrawal from the world. This is the path of the man who slips into darkness in order to have the light revealed to him when he is ready.  

Monday, December 13, 2010




BusterStronghart@Gmail.com
Posted by Picasa



BusterStronghart@Gmail.com
Posted by Picasa
BusterStronghart@Gmail.com

I spent my youth with men who thought that Omar Khayyám might have been a curry. One of them was a very charming man, named Phillip Legacy; when he wore a suit I understood why God created suits for men. There was a case of missing funds from a church hospital fund. And Phillip was wearing a new suit.  I have mistrusted charming men ever since.


He married a woman who had become pregnant with his child. He told her that abortions were easy to obtain--long before they were legal--but she refused. It was their child she cried, and abortion would be out of the question. Well, he said, you'll have to learn to like me.  She stood at the altar, and realized that she was participating in a sham. 

Helpless, she gave herself up to him, 

She tried but quickly became bored with him. She was an explorer, and had to meet the people, all of them, whether bejeweled or barefoot she needed to be engaged. 

Golf and cocktail parties were enough for him.   


Tuesday, November 23, 2010

BusterStronghart@Gmail.com

Images of the North

 Images of the North; sacred wind, spirit untamed,
 huge trees, grasping arms, holding you in tight embrace.
 You can't let go.
 You can't escape the power of their aloneness.
 They have lost their beauty long ago,
 You can't hide the overwhelming pressure in your head.
 Only a harsh naked wisdom left.
 The Ache.
 You could paddle thru eternity and that would never change.
  Only
  a silent surging poem from one tongue to another.
B. Pessin.